Now I understand why John Walton is so insightful when it comes to the background of the Hebrew Bible! (I hope he didn’t save any of those peanut better and jelly on manna sandwiches!)
Now I understand why John Walton is so insightful when it comes to the background of the Hebrew Bible! (I hope he didn’t save any of those peanut better and jelly on manna sandwiches!)
The narratives of the death of Judas (Matt 27.3-10 and Acts 1.15-26) present themselves as a perpetual problem to those who seek to harmonize parts of Scripture. Here are the two passages:
Matthew 27.3-10 [NRSV]
When Judas, his betrayer, saw that Jesus was condemned, he repented and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders. He said, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.” But they said, “What is that to us? See to it yourself.” Throwing down the pieces of silver in the temple, he departed; and he went and hanged himself. But the chief priests, taking the pieces of silver, said, “It is not lawful to put them into the treasury, since they are blood money.” After conferring together, they used them to buy the potter’s field as a place to bury foreigners. For this reason that field has been called the Field of Blood to this day. Then was fulfilled what had been spoken through the prophet Jeremiah, “And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of the one on whom a price had been set, on whom some of the people of Israel had set a price, and they gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord commanded me.”
Acts 1.15-26 [NRSV]
In those days Peter stood up among the believers (together the crowd numbered about one hundred twenty persons) and said, “Friends, the scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit through David foretold concerning Judas, who became a guide for those who arrested Jesus— for he was numbered among us and was allotted his share in this ministry.” (Now this man acquired a field with the reward of his wickedness; and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out. This became known to all the residents of Jerusalem, so that the field was called in their language Hakeldama, that is, Field of Blood.) “For it is written in the book of Psalms,
‘Let his homestead become desolate,
and let there be no one to live in it’;
and ‘Let another take his position of overseer.’ So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us—one of these must become a witness with us to his resurrection.” So they proposed two, Joseph called Barsabbas, who was also known as Justus, and Matthias. Then they prayed and said, “Lord, you know everyone’s heart. Show us which one of these two you have chosen to take the place in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside to go to his own place.” And they cast lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthias; and he was added to the eleven apostles.
The usual harmonization states that Judas hung himself (ala Matthew’s account) and remained there for a few days while his dead body became swollen. Then the branch on which he hung himself broke Read the rest of this entry »
The announcement of Christian Chirp, a Christian alternative to Twitter, has been met, at least by myself and people I know, with a large amount of disgust. It’s not just because the founder, James L. Paris, is both a fraud and a liar, it’s because Christian Chirp, perhaps better than anything else, represents what’s perceived as a completely lame attempt for Christians to create their alternative community.
Not only is Christian Chirp, and other things that label themselves as ‘Christian alternatives,’ undergirded by an awful theology of what it means to be the people of God, it also reflects something else that is a staple of things ’sanctified’ by the Christian community: it’s a cheap impersonation.
If you’ve visited Christian Chirp then you obviously see the similarities it has with Twitter. But it is a poor execution of the otherwise revolutionary idea that is Twitter. It is a poorly done rip off of something that is wildly popular.
What does this say to unbelievers? The theological problems aside, Read the rest of this entry »
I recently began reading Sin: A History by Gary A. Anderson, professor of Old Testament/Hebrew Bible at the University of Notre Dame.
What I am finding interesting about the book is overall methodology of the study. Anderson pays close attention to primary texts, such as the Hebrew Bible, second Temple literature, and the NT, to trace how the concept of sin has evolved throughout those texts. The metaphors used for sin change (weight or burden, stain, and debt) throughout time, as does both the understanding of what sin is and how sin is to be treated (weight or burden to be lifted, stain to be cleansed, debt to be repaid). By paying close attention to the metaphors for sin we can come to a better understanding Read the rest of this entry »
I’d like to first thank the people at Dutton for sending me a copy of this book. Their generosity has made this review possible.
Tim Keller’s newest book, at the title suggests, deals with idols, or counterfeit gods, that each of us have in our lives. At times these idols can be obvious; other times our idols can be harder to figure out. As Keller points out, our idols can sometimes actually be very good things, such as our family, our friends, our work, or our ministries. These can sometimes be the hardest things to view as Read the rest of this entry »
After the last post I was pointed to an article in the last issue of the Journal of Biblical Literature (128.2) by Joel Baden of Yale Divinity School. The article is entitled “The Tower of Babel: A Case Study in the Competing Methods of Historical and Modern Literary Criticism.”
What I found interesting about the article is that Baden shows some of the short comings of certain literary critics in their search for unity in the text. Some of the points made by these literary critics are just as easily explainable from a source-critical analysis. But Baden does not use his critique in order to write off literary criticism. Rather, he concludes: Read the rest of this entry »
I’ve been thinking about the idea of focusing on the ‘narrative’ of the Pentateuch since the news of Sailhamer’s newest book reached me a two days ago. Simply put: it bothers me.
Without going into too much detail at the moment (partly because of midterms and papers that are due and partly because I plan on blogging more about this in the near future), there are a few things that bother me the most about the focus on ‘canonical’ or ‘narratival’ readings of the Pentateuch.
First, it puts too little stress on the historical context of the strands of tradition that ultimately became canonized in the Pentateuch. To ignore questions and implications of the historical contexts of these strands usually leads one Read the rest of this entry »
The rumor I wrote about yesterday seems to be true. Lucky for the messenger as she will now not be shunned!
The Resurgence blog has just announced the creation of Redeemer Free Sermon Resource, which intially will offer 150 free sermons and lectures by Tim Keller. From the site Read the rest of this entry »
If anyone has been racking their brain as to what to get me for Christmas, look no further.

I just heard a rumor that Tim Keller’s sermons will now be free with a podcast to be published soon. I checked the sermon download section of Redeemer’s website and it seems that all of the sermons preached after 27 September 2009 are free for download (as opposed to the $2.50 usually charged for the MP3).
I do hope that this rumor is true! If it turns out to be false then I will shun the person responsible for starting this rumor for an indefinite period of time.