on the biologos website john walton responds to vern poythress’s review of “the lost world of genesis one”. i reviewed walton’s book here. poythress recently wrote a review for world magazine where offers some critiques and reservations of walton’s work. i think walton answered those criticisms well. the most pertinent point that walton makes, i think, is the lack of interaction with ancient near eastern sources by poythress in his review. any serious critique of walton’s work, which is based on ancient near eastern backgrounds, has to deal with the primary material. it will be interesting to see if poythress responds.
















